AGC's efforts to block California's request to EPA to enforce a costly, unsafe rule was reported in The Washington Post.  In the article, AGC's Mike Kennedy, general counsel, was quoted:"What is the point of stimulus money if it's used to replace equipment instead of building?" asked Mike Kennedy, general counsel of the Arlington-based group. The regulators "assumed costs could be passed along, but economic circumstances have changed so dramatically that the rule has to be reopened."In addition, The Sacramento Union recently published an editorial that argues that stimulus funds will do little for California contractors who need to pull most of their equipment in order to comply with the rule.

Last August, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to approve the state's new standards for off-road diesel engine emissions, which would force construction companies in California to replace most of their heavy construction equipment.  In mid-December, AGC asked EPA either to deny that request, or in the alternative, to defer any decision until California considers AGC's formal petition to reopen or repeal the nation's first-ever statewide rule on the exhaust from existing fleets of off-road diesel equipment.  In a concerted effort to influence EPA, AGC chapter staff and members used the AGC Legislative Action Center to tell EPA how their businesses will be impacted if California's emission standards spread nationwide.

Nearly 600 interested stakeholders registered for a webinar that AGC sponsored in conjunction with the Diesel Technology Forum on Dec. 3-Off-Road Diesel Developments: Clean Diesel Technology, Regulations and Requirements Facing Today's Construction Industry.  The recorded webinar as well as the presentations are available at no charge at www.dieselforum.org/webinars.AGC staff presented on the Association's overall policy on diesel retrofit and also provided details on California's off-road diesel emission standards, including the problems that the rule raises in that state and nationwide. Representatives from Caterpillar and John Deere discussed the changes being made to new construction equipment to reduce engine emissions, as well as the costs and benefits of retrofit technologies designed to clean-up the existing diesel fleets.For additional information, contact Leah Pilconis at pilconisl@agc.org.

California’s Air Resources Board is currently seeking a special waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would allow it to put in place new rules that would force the state’s builders to replace virtually every piece of motorized construction equipment they own.

Members of the AGC Environmental Network Steering Committee, along with senior AGC staff, met with senior representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Details of the meeting are available here.For more information, contact Melinda Tomaino at (703) 837-5415 or tomainom@agc.org.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to approve the state's recently adopted off-road engine emission standards that will force construction companies in California to retrofit or replace almost all of their heavy construction equipment.  EPA must review and approve California's standards before the state can legally enforce them; a Clean Air Act process called "granting a waiver of federal preemption."  If EPA grants the state's waiver request, other states would be free to adopt California's new rules, which apply to all off-road diesel fleets currently in use.

On Dec. 15, AGC of America and its two California chapters formally petitioned the state of California to reconsider or repeal a new rule that would force construction companies across the state to retrofit or replace almost all of their heavy construction equipment.  California's new standards are enormously complex and certain to cost California's contractors billions of dollars.

A proposed rule released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Nov. 19 would establish the first national effluent (discharge) limit for stormwater runoff from construction sites.  Upon early review, it appears that AGC’s advocacy efforts and close work with EPA staff have produced a workable proposal that recognizes the importance of providing contractors with the flexibility to select best management practices (BMPs) to fit the conditions of their sites.  Much work remains, however, to ensure that the final rule does not include a strict numeric limit dictating the amount of sediment that may lawfully be discharged from construction sites across the country.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 from 2:00-3:30pm ET  -- As "green" or sustainable construction becomes more commonplace, it is important to understand the potential risk management issues involved. This webinar takes a closer look at the insurance and surety implications when contractors are participating in delivering sustainable buildings.

A proposed rule released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Nov. 19 would establish the first national effluent (discharge) limit for stormwater runoff from construction sites.  Contractors would have to meet EPA’s technology-based “floor” on most sites by installing and maintaining a range of erosion and sediment controls that “are generally recognized and accepted as effective” best management practices (BMPs).  Construction sites disturbing 10 or more acres of land at a time would also need to install sediment basins to treat their stormwater discharges.  In addition, a strict numeric limit on the allowable level of turbidity would apply to sites of 30 acres or more that are located in rainy areas where the soil has high clay content. AGC is analyzing EPA’s proposal with an eye to the underlying data on the costs and benefits of the rule and will keep chapters and members informed of its actions.  The construction and development (C&D) effluent limitation guideline (ELG) proposal and other information are online at http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/guide/construction/. EPA will accept public comment for 90 days after the proposal appears in the Federal Register; publication is scheduled for Nov. 28.